History of Occupancy
| By Month | By Fiscal Period |
| Office Building | Retail Property | Residential Property | Other Property | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Tokyo |
Tokyo Metropolitan Area |
Other Area | ||||||
| April 2012 |
Number of properties | 8 | 1 | - | 3 | 5 | 1 | 18 |
| Number of tenants | 27 | 1 | - | 6 | 5 | 1 | 40 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 135,328.82 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 25,170.94 | 6,121.85 | 300,294.23 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 97.9 | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | 93.8 | 100.0 | 98.5 | |
| March 2012 |
Number of properties | 8 | 1 | - | 3 | 5 | 1 | 18 |
| Number of tenants | 26 | 1 | - | 6 | 5 | 1 | 39 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 135,328.82 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 25,170.94 | 6,121.85 | 300,294.23 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 96.9 | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | 94.5 | 100.0 | 98.1 | |
| February 2012 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | - | 3 | 5 | 1 | 17 |
| Number of tenants | 25 | 1 | - | 6 | 5 | 1 | 38 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,295.78 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 25,170.94 | 6,121.85 | 294,261.19 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 95.5 | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | 93.2 | 100.0 | 97.4 | |
| January 2012 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | - | 3 | 4 | 1 | 16 |
| Number of tenants | 24 | 1 | - | 6 | 4 | 1 | 36 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,295.78 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 21,715.26 | 6,121.85 | 290,805.51 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 94.8 | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | 94.6 | 100.0 | 97.3 | |
| December 2011 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | - | 3 | 4 | 1 | 16 |
| Number of tenants | 24 | 1 | - | 6 | 4 | 1 | 36 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,295.78 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 21,715.26 | 6,121.85 | 290,805.51 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 94.8 | 95.0 | - | 100.0 | 95.3 | 100.0 | 97.3 | |
| November 2011 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | - | 3 | 4 | 1 | 16 |
| Number of tenants | 24 | 1 | - | 6 | 4 | 1 | 36 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,295.78 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 21,715.26 | 6,121.85 | 290,805.51 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 94.8 | 95.0 | - | 100.0 | 94.3 | 100.0 | 97.2 | |
- (Note 1)
- The number of tenants represents the number for each property as of the end of each month. When a single tenant has more than one rented space in the property, it is counted as a single tenant (when the tenant rents space at multiple properties, the tenant is counted once for each property). In addition, when there is a master lease, the lessee of that master lease alone is counted as a single tenant.
- (Note 2)
- The rentable area represents the rentable area as of the end of each month. As for sectional ownership properties, a figure in which the calculated figure is multiplied by the concerned equity interest is used.
- (Note 3)
- The above occupancy figures represent the total rented area of the total rentable area as of the end of each month as percentages rounded to the first decimal place. As for pass-through master leases, the area subleased to the end tenants is used to represent the rented area.
| Office Building | Retail Property | Residential Property | Other Property | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Tokyo |
Tokyo Metropolitan Area |
Other Area | ||||||
| April 2012 |
Number of properties | 8 | 1 | - | 3 | 5 | 1 | 18 |
| Number of tenants | 27 | 1 | - | 6 | 5 | 1 | 40 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 135,328.82 | 5,850.23 | - | 127,822.39 | 25,170.94 | 6,121.85 | 300,294.23 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 97.9 | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | 93.8 | 100.0 | 98.5 | |
| October 2011 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 17 |
| Number of tenants | 24 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 48 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,295.78 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 21,715.26 | 6,121.85 | 295,215.03 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 94.8 | 95.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 95.0 | 100.0 | 97.3 | |
| April 2011 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| Number of tenants | 24 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 46 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,277.26 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 18,146.47 | 6,121.85 | 291,627.72 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.8 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 95.7 | 100.0 | 99.7 | |
| October 2010 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| Number of tenants | 24 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 46 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,277.26 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 18,146.47 | 6,121.85 | 291,627.72 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.8 | 95.8 | 96.9 | 100.0 | 95.1 | 100.0 | 99.5 | |
| April 2010 |
Number of properties | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| Number of tenants | 23 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 44 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 129,297.42 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 18,146.47 | 6,121.85 | 291,647.88 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.8 | 95.8 | 90.6 | 100.0 | 92.7 | 100.0 | 99.2 | |
| October 2009 | Number of properties | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| Number of tenants | 22 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 42 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 121,271.77 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 18,146.47 | 6,121.85 | 283,622.23 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.6 | 95.8 | 90.6 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 100.0 | 99.2 | |
| April 2009 | Number of properties | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| Number of tenants | 22 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 42 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 121,271.77 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 18,146.47 | 6,121.85 | 283,622.23 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.6 | 90.4 | 94.2 | 100.0 | 93.9 | 100.0 | 99.2 | |
| October 2008 | Number of properties | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| Number of tenants | 23 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 44 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 121,271.77 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 18,146.47 | 6,121.85 | 283,622.23 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 100.0 | 90.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 94.6 | 100.0 | 99.5 | |
| April 2008 | Number of properties | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| Number of tenants | 23 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 43 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 121,271.77 | 5,850.23 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 11,357.44 | 6,121.85 | 276,833.20 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 88.7 | 100.0 | 99.5 | |
| October 2007 | Number of properties | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Number of tenants | 21 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 40 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 107,297.14 | 4,663.33 | 4,409.52 | 127,822.39 | 11,357.44 | 6,121.85 | 261,671.67 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 93.6 | 100.0 | 99.7 | |
| April 2007 | Number of properties | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Number of tenants | 21 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 39 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 107,297.14 | 4,663.33 | 4,409.53 | 127,822.39 | 11,357.44 | 6,121.85 | 261,671.68 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 89.5 | 100.0 | 99.5 | |
| October 2006 | Number of properties | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | 8 |
| Number of tenants | 21 | 1 | 9 | 3 | - | - | 34 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 107,297.14 | 4,663.33 | 4,409.53 | 112,861.70 | - | - | 229,231.70 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | - | 99.9 | |
| March 2006 (IPO) | Number of properties | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 7 |
| Number of tenants | 19 | 1 | 9 | 2 | - | - | 31 | |
| Rentable area (㎡) | 107,268.32 | 4,663.33 | 4,409.53 | 61,763.28 | - | - | 178,104.46 | |
| Occupancy (%） | 99.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | - | 99.8 | |
- (Note 1)
- The number of tenants represents the number for each property at the time of listing and as of the end of each fiscal period. When a single tenant has more than one rented space in the property, it is counted as a single tenant (when the tenant rents space at multiple properties, the tenant is counted once for each property). In addition, when there is a master lease, the lessee of that master lease alone is counted as a single tenant.
- (Note 2)
- The rentable area represents the rentable area at the time of listing and as of the end of each fiscal period. As for sectional ownership properties, a figure in which the calculated figure is multiplied by the concerned equity interest is used.
- (Note 3)
- The above occupancy figures represent the total rented area of the total rentable area at the time of listing and as of the end of each fiscal period as percentages rounded to the first decimal place. As for pass-through master leases, the area subleased to the end tenants is used to represent the rented area.
